it
should
A[
? proceed as at ) above.
HE. Bader
17/12/34
I cannot quite agree
cleary
because we told Hong Kong quite
in (1) that the financial arrangements for
a feeder service would he outside the scope of the
aik
main scheme, and we are have concerned
only the main scheme. In the cires. I would support
asking
the W.D. for their obseus on (2) mit stands.
Ielade
Mr Code's
17-12-34
comment is striching correct.
But swier the proposals in I for H15
to subsidite the new
Au Mail Scheme ría
Smgapore
for as HK mails are concerned
amed)
were put to the Gov
This has been a
$300,0
300,000 over five years in th an instalment of
100,
100
In the
fust year.
Ins
finthur decision to establish direct air
Connexion
with HK involving
inestring
further large subsidy" from HK finds
in aid of a proposed extension of the Air Line som Bangkok to HK.
It is possible that
the latter will turn to be the
that
first of the hoo
to hrome exfection.
inporabo NOI
This will upset the calculations
frour
air mail sabredung
resumed
4x:? curante
47.
/
17
6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.